Week 11: Chapter 12, 'Broadcast Journalism: the world's town crier'.

Reading: Chapter 12 - Broadcast Journalism: the world's town crier in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

• Do you think the ABC should be privatised? What impact might this have on broadcast journalism? If you disagree, could the government funding process be made less 'political'?

Privatising the ABC would be would be an absolute mistake. The ABC provides some of the Australia's most informative and important current affairs and political programs available on the radio. The ABC is free from commercial influence in that it is funded by the government. Commercialising the ABC would have devastating effects on the integrity and overall content of it's broadcast programming. The ABC essentially acts as the fourth estate, it checks and balances the government by holding them accountable for their actions. Commercialising the ABC would undoubtedly shift the ABC away from doing this essential role. Commercialism promotes bias and unfavourable content for money.

• You are a television news director with two strong job applications. One is from a 'telegenic' male, 28, with reasonable skill and experience. The other is from a female, 38. She is of 'average' appearance but has considerable skill and experience. Your present staff consists of four females and one male, none older than 32. Who do you hire and why?

In a perfect world, skill and experience would obviously be much more favourable than youth and good looks. I would probably, unashamedly hire the male, for several reasons. He's young and has some experience, training someone and seeing them develop to their full potential would be a great thing to do. Definite job satisfaction in that. He's a male, and not being sexist, the station already has four females and only one male. The lone ranger needs a partner in crime. Sorry to the old bird, but theres too many things going for the young chap.

• Given the strengths and weaknesses of each medium, which do you think is the 'best communicator' on any given story: radio, television, the web or newspapers?

We all know that each of the different mediums definitely have their strengths and weaknesses. Going into each medium would take a while. But I still think newspapers are the best communicators in terms of content. Other mediums maybe more accessable, but newspaper allow for much more in depth coverage and opinion on news issues. Newspaper articles aren't constricted by time and they don't have to be written to images. Each of the different mediums are good for different reasons, in terms of communication, the in depth, hard coverage of an issue is always going to be better than something that has to accomodate images and time constraints.

• During the last federal election campaign do you think the broadcast media focused more on issues or personalities? What could have been done better?

Although it would appear that the last election focused to closely upon the personalities I think if you look more closely at the outcome and the reasons why, then the issues seem to take prevalence as to the reasons for the election win by Kevin Rudd.
Sure K-Rudd had an extremely well orchestrated PR plan that helped him win the 'hearts and minds' of the people. Not since Hitler's use of imagery, slogans and hysteria has their been a political PR campaign like this. 'Kevin 07', T-shirts, an holistic approach to new media including youtube, facebook and myspace all helped to carve out a lasting impression of K-Rudds personality to the Australian people. The media lapped it up.
BUT the thing that ensure Kevin Rudd one the election, is that behind the facade, there was some dynamic and significant promises to policy change that excited the nation. The ending of work choices, an 'education revolution' and a new era of economic policy were all focused upon heavily by the Australian media. What could have been done better? Maybe K-Rudd could follow through with some of promises?

Week 10: Chapter 11, 'Reporting for duty'.

Reading: Chapter 11 - Reporting for duty in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

Like last weeks post, the questions for this week are like small novels and I really couldn't be bothered typing them out. My wrists hurt.

• If the story is legitimate and the chief is telling you that you have to write the story, then I think you have to write the story. You should also probably tell the chief of the police officers threats and possibly write a story about that, you may have to change from the rounds after, but at least you keep your integrity and keep your job. Probably write some pretty neat little articles along the way too.

• Forget the story and the get the woman some help. It's such a trivial matter that a stolen pair of stockings pales in significance to the death of a mentally unstable woman.

• Report the case in all it's full and juicey details. Plus the offers for sex, a holiday or money. It would make a good, shitty story. Celebrities revel in this sort of stuff.

• Publish an article on the jurors revelations. It would be an important story for the public to know and letting off a murderer for money is not cool. Not cool at all.
  

Week 9: Chapter 10, 'The story factory'.

Reading: Chapter 10 - The story factory in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

I've been typing the questions out from the list at the end of each weeks chapter, but this week the questions are really long so I've chosen not to.

• Quite a conundrum this question is, a pickle even. As a journalist, you don't want to burn your bridges by going against the wishes of a source. But you also want to write cutting edge, news breaking stories. If there is knowledge that another outlet has the story, it might be a good idea to against the source, and against the idea of writing the story in two days for convenience sake to get the breaking story. It's a matter of making sure you're not doing too much damage to your source by breaking the story early.

• I'd drop the story. It's just how I'm inclined. I'd write the story and go to the restaurant and inform the staff and management of my knowledge of what's happening and tell them they need to shape up, if they don't within a certain time, I run the story. You can't destroy 120 jobs over a problem that has potential to be fixed quickly.
  

• The guy's pissed and theres a chance he's not actually a solicitor. I would consult the paper's lawyer immediately with all the details of the call and pretty much do what he tells me to do. He's a lawyer!

• I'm sticking with the editor. Don't bite the hand that feeds. For this story anyway. I will break the next Watergate in a few years. Shaun C. Burgess and Matthew A. Murray = Newcastle's Carl Bernstein and Bob Woodward.
  

Week 8: Chapter 9, 'Interviewing, a core skill'.

Reading: Chapter 9 - Interviewing, a core skill in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

• Which would you choose: a direct quotation that is accurate but unclear and embarrassing to the speaker, or one that is clear but is inexact and makes the speaker appear more eloquent than he or she really is?

Both quotes clearly have things wrong with them, but I would use the direct quote that is inaccurate and embarrassing. If it is direct, the journalist is only recite something that has been directly stated, it is not up to the journalist to sort out somebody else's inaccuracies.

• Is it ever justified for a journalist to intimidate a source with 'public exposure' to important public information?

I don't think it is ever justified and it is morally and ethically wrong to intimidate a source to get information, although I'm sure it is done on an almost daily basis.

• Is it a reasonable strategy for a journalist - male or female - to use 'personal chemistry' to get information from sources when there is public interest at stake?

It's not a reasonable strategy to use sex appeal to gain information from a source. The problem with using sex appeal to gain information is that there is always a chance of it ruining any integrity that a story reveals as the personal chemistry used to obtain the information can always be called into question by people questioning whether the information is legitimate or not.

• What potential dangers could come back to haunt a journalist who gets too close to a source?

As above, the entire story could be ruined by the journalist getting to close with the source. Everyone will question if the information is legitimate as it came from the journo being so close to the source.
If a journalist becomes very close to the source, the legitimacy could also be questioned in that the source may give the journalist false information just to please them.

• Who is the most inarticulate, word mangling public figure in the news at present? Should you feel sorry for them and fix up their quotes or let them burn?

Sarah Palin, this says it all: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NrzXLYA_e6E

Week 7: Chapter 8, 'Small path, big story'.

Reading: Chapter 8 - Small path, big story in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

• Which type of story would you rather do and why:

1. a 'paper chase' conducted entirely by computer and telephone that takes half the time it would have taken if you had left the office
2. a 'paper chase' involving visits to half a dozen government offices and in-person interviews that puts you under extreme deadline pressure?

The paper chase that gets me out of the office is the one I'd prefer to do. One of the most important things a journalist can do is develop reliable, trustworthy sources for information. Networking and getting out of the office is the only way to do this. The chances of developing these contacts staying in the office are definitely a lot more slim.

As for the extreme deadline pressure, similar to above, if you were afraid of a few deadlines, this is the wrong industry to be getting involved in.

• Would you be willing to pursue a corruption investigation or an investigation in organised crime if it included many unpaid hours of extra work and personal risk?

Definitely. IS there anyone doing this course that wouldn't? I think this is hands-down the best sort of work in journalism. The ability to break something of great significance to the world is more than worth extra unpaid work. As for the injury, working on something that could potentially save hundreds of lives is definitely worth a few injuries.

• Would you be willing to act together as a unit with competing reporters at a media conference in an effort to get maximum information if it meant giving up your best best question, which you had intended to ask privately after the conference?

Again, the key to journalism is developing contacts and gaining peoples' trust. Keeping questions on public record is also a much better idea so people can't dispute the facts and they know exactly what was asked and the subsequent response. 

• Who really owns government-held information: the government or the people? Why?

The people. The government is elected by the people, for the people. The government acts in every way, on behalf of the people. Therefore government held-information is information for the people.

• If you were assigned to report on the proceedings of a conference and you had to choose between attending different sessions being conducted at the same time, how would you decide which to attend?

Research. Research allows a journalist to have a much better idea of what is going to be addressed in each different session of any conference. Having a better idea of what will be going on in each different session allows a journalist to adequately prepare for the session and also allows the journalist a chance to know which session will be most useful for their story.

Week 6: Chapter 7, 'A word's worth'.

Reading: Chapter 7 - A word's worth in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to Journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

• At what educational level of readers should newspapers be aiming? Do you think your main metropolitan newspaper is hitting the mark? Why or why not?

I think the education level of newspaper readers should be almost irrelevant. Although people need to be able to read to get any use out of a newspaper, a newspaper should essentially use the most basic, easy to understand and clear language to convey its message.

There is room for more sophisticated writing, editorials and opinion pieces often need to use more sophisticated language to make their point.

The Newcastle Herald is a very popular paper. It serves the entire Newcastle and Central Coast regions and has a circulation of approximately 153 000 people Monday to Friday and 225 000 people on Saturdays.

I think the Herald actually does a good job at reaching as many people in its demographic as possible. It may sometimes lack in quality, sophisticated journalism as that of a paper like The Australian, but overall it serves its purpose of providing news to the people of the Hunter and Central Coasts. The education level of a Herald reader could be anywhere from late primary school onwards.

• To what extent do you think reporters should be able to interpret news events and inject their thoughts into news stories?

This question is directly mentioned in the text under the Style and substance sub-heading. "A journalist without style is a journalist without substance, and a journalist without substance is, in effect, not a journalist".

There should be a house style at most publications, this is only to ensure the paper is consistent throughout and flows well.

Injecting thoughts into the news should be left to the opinion columns. Newspaper news should be simple, flow well and avoid cliches and unnecessary adjectives.

• English is a growing and ever-changing language as new words evolve and old ones fall into disuse. What then of the idea of a global language? Does it really matter that our language is being tainted with Americanisms and US spelling?

Newspaper journalism should be the highest example of Australia's style and prose. Americanisms and US spelling is never acceptable in Australian newspapers. News Limited produced a generic industry standard on usage to satisfy the aim of keeping readers comfortable wherever they are, be it at home, or traveling overseas.

Australia has a unique style and history all of our own, we should preserve its uniqueness.

• Based on your own experience and your reading of newspapers, do you think newspapers have a serious commitment to accuracy?

In terms of usage, Newspapers seem to be very accurate. I don't think I've come across a spelling mistake or poor grammar, although I've probably missed the poor stuff. In other areas, I'm not as convinced. Journalists are increasingly under pressure to work faster, with less staff and to produce a product of an increasingly high quality and standard. Accuracy when working under such conditions is bound to happen. Following up and checking sources to ensure accuracy will surely suffer under these circumstances.

• What would you do if you made a serious mistake in a story you wrote but no one contacted the paper to complain?

You have to fess up to your mistakes. Even if no one reported the mistake, people still appreciate when somebody honestly owns up to stuffing up. We're all human after all.

Week 5: Chapter 6, 'Upside Down Pyramids'.

I was a little late with this post due to the birth of Noah Rigby Allen Murray. He's my son and he's pretty handsome, thats him up there!


Reading: Chapter 6 - Upside down pyramids in The Daily Miracle: An introduction to Journalism / David Conley & Stephen Lamble. Melbourne, Victoria. Oxford University Press, 2006. 3rd ed.

• Would you include balancing comment (in the form of a source's statement) in a story if you knew that the statement was untrue but could not say so or prove that it was untrue, and the source insisted that the comment be included?

No. Publishing an untrue statement is very damaging for the individual reporter and the publication. An untrue statement leaves the publication open to be prosecuted under defamation laws. An untrue statement also affects the fairness and balance of a story, unfavorably slanting a story in a certain direction.

• Because you could not locate a source for balancing comment, would you withhold a story on which you have worked hard? Would your decision change if you knew that an opposing newspaper was planning to run a similar story, reducing the value of your effort?

It is possible, depending on the circumstances of the story, for a reporter to write a follow up piece the next day. If an opposing paper was to publish a similar story with the same amount of knowledge that I had, it might be a good idea to wait until a balancing comment is found and make my story more legitimate.

• You are sent to report from the scene of a major uncontrolled fire in a high-rise building. People are trapped inside. What dangers should you look out for? Who would you interview? When would you start writing the story?

Dangers at a fire scene would firstly include the fire. Structural damage and the ensuing chaos a fire brings with it are all very dangerous elements. Keeping clear of all emergency workers so they can get on with their jobs and save lives is imperative. Taking a calm, collected and unaggressive approach to the situation is very important. The text states that '[r]eporters who are too aggressive in such circumstances risk becoming the targets of people experiencing anger, fear, shock, or anxiety' (Conley & Lamble, 2006, p. 130).

Fire, police and medical officers are all high priority people to interview they can provide authoritative comment on injuries, structural damage, the fire's trail, and suspected causes.
Witnesses are also very significant people to interview. Witnesses are often easy to identify, and they often stick around to the end of an incident. The main use of witnesses is to allow the reporter to get a grasp of the facts.

Due to the circumstances of the incident, it would be very important to see the outcome of the event. The story could either be a recount of a tragedy, or a tale of heroism from the brave personnel who saved people from an inferno. Writing after the event also allows for the reporter to check the facts and write an accurate story.

• From your reading of news stories, do you think the inverted pyramid remains the most effective method of structuring material?

For straight up newspaper news, the inverted pyramid is definitely the most effective method of structuring material. Readers have become very accustomed to having their news presented in this fashion. It attracts the readers with the most important facts in the lead and allows sub editors to quickly and effectively tailor a story to fit, without loosing any of the important, newsworthy facts.